When you're selling dreams,
the trick is to strike a balance between utopian promises and common sense.
A week ago today, a privately
funded startup called Planetary Resources announced
that it had embarked on a program to mine trillions of dollars' worth of
precious metals and other resources from asteroids in space. The project is
undeniably ambitious, yet in their press conference the company's executives
took pains to emphasize the pragmatism of their approach.
Exponential advances in
technology now make it possible, said co-founder and co-chairman Peter
Diamandis, for small companies to accomplish what once required the backing of
governments or large corporations. Planetary Resources plans to deploy "swarms"
of low-cost telescope satellites to find asteroids that are rich in water,
platinum, and other assets, but relatively close to Earth. They will then be
mined not by people but by robots.
To be sure, there's nothing
modest about the profits Planetary Resources hopes to realize. There were also
frequent mentions during the press conference of how the project's success would
benefit all of humankind, not only by developing new supplies of diminishing resources
but also by keeping alive the dream of space exploration itself. Still, the gee
whiz factor was kept to a minimum. Diamandis even claimed at one point that he'd
dreamed since he was a teenager of being an asteroid miner, which seemed to be
taking pragmatism a bit too far. Surely a teenager can
imagine more glamorous things to do in space than that.
Planetary Resources' Co-founders and Co-chairmen Peter Diamandis and Eric Anderson and (center) President and Chief Engineer Chris Lewicki |
The press conference's one
truly utopian moment came in a comment from Planetary Resource's other co-founder
and co-chairman, Eric Anderson. My guess is that he momentarily let his
enthusiasm get the best of him when he let slip his vision of where, in the
long run, this could be heading. "We see the future of Earth as a garden
of Eden," he said, "as a place where we take care of the Earth and
protect the environment and we do our heavy industries and our mining and all
that sort of stuff in space!"
Ah, the Garden of Eden. In
truth that's what we've always been after, although we're less inclined to
admit it today than we used to be. In 1833 a German immigrant named John Adolphus Etzler
published The
Paradise Within Reach of All Men, the first extended work of
technological utopianism to appear in the United States. Follow my proposals
for harnessing the elements with machines, Etzler declared, and within ten
years "everything desirable for human life may be had by every man in
superabundance, without labor, and without pay; where the whole face of nature
shall be changed into the most beautiful forms, and man may live in the most
magnificent palaces, in all imaginable refinements of luxury…" He went on.
Etzler
predicted that some would greet his proposals with ridicule, and he was right. Among
them was Henry David Thoreau, who published, anonymously, a review of
Etzler's book that was slyly humorous in parts, openly sarcastic in others. "Let
us not succumb to nature," he wrote. "We will marshal the clouds and
restrain the tempests; we will bottle up pestilent exhalations, we will probe
for earthquakes, grub them up; and give vent to the dangerous gases; we will
disembowel the volcano, and extract its poison, take its seed out. We will wash
water, and warm fire, and cool ice, and underprop the earth. We will teach
birds to fly, and fishes to swim, and ruminants to chew the cud. It is time we
had looked into these things."
Gerard O'Neill in 1977 |
A similar exchange occurred in
the mid 1970s when a Princeton physics
professor named Gerard
O'Neill came forward with his own proposal for mining asteroids. O'Neill envisioned
a series of permanently inhabited, self-sustaining human colonies orbiting in
deep space. Huge inter-connected cylinders, each encompassing a land area as
large as 100 square miles, would accommodate, in addition to extensive mining
operations, capacious living quarters, gardens, and recreation areas. Settlers
would be attracted not only by the promise of employment, O'Neill said, but
also by internal climate conditions equivalent to "quite attractive modern
communities in the U.S. and
in southern France."
He added that, because levels of gravity could be varied within the cylinders,
a short walk up a hillside could bring a resident to an area where
"human-powered flight would be easy" and "sports and ballet
could take on a new dimensions."
Government funding was still
the way to go at that point, and O'Neill appeared before subcommittees of the
House of Representatives and the Senate to present his ideas. Here, too, it seems
clear the intention was to portray the project as entirely reasonable. Mentions
of southern France
and flying ballet dancers were exceptions; charts and graphs were the rule. What
we're talking about, O'Neill testified, is "civil engineering on a large
scale in a well-understood, highly-predictable environment."
Again, naysayers emerged. Stewart
Brand solicited comments on the project for the Spring 1976 edition of CoEvolution
Quarterly, a spinoff of the Whole
Earth Catalog. Brand was an enthusiastic supporter, but many of his readers
weren't. The writer, farmer and environmentalist Wendell Berry called O'Neill's proposals "an ideal solution to the moral dilemma of all
those in this society who cannot face the necessities of meaningful
change." E F. Schumacher, author of Small Is Beautiful, wrote that he'd be happy to nominate several hundred people to ship into outer space
immediately, so that the real work of saving the planet could proceed unimpeded.
Planetary Resources investors Eric Schmidt and James Cameron. Other investors include Larry Page, former Microsoft executive Charles Simonyi, and Ross Perot, Jr. |
Failing to find support in
Congress, O'Neill's project faded away. Soon after that the personal computer
industry began its remarkable rise in Silicon Valley,
reinvigorating the idea that technology can change the world overnight, making a
lot of people extremely rich in the process. No accident that many of Planetary
Resources' investors acquired their fortunes digitally. When you have billions to
spend, your dreams don't have to make sense.
©Doug Hill, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment